golang进程在docker中OOM后hang住问题解析
目录
正文
结论：
正文golang版本：1.16
背景：golang进程在docker中运行，因为使用内存较多，经常在内存未达到docker上限时，就被oom-kill，为了避免程序频繁被杀，在docker启动时禁用了oom-kill，但是出现了新的问题。
现象：docker内存用满后，golang进程hang住，无任何响应（没有额外内存系统无法分配新的fd，无法服务），即使在程序内置了内存达到上限就重启，也不会生效，只能kill
因为pprof查看进程内存有很多是能在gc时释放的，起初怀疑是golang进程问题
在hang住之前，先登录到docker上，写一个golang测试程序，只申请一小段内存后sleep，启动时加GODEBUG=GCTRACE=1打印gc信息，发现mark 阶段stw耗时达到31s(31823+15+0.11 ms对应STW Mark Prepare，Concurrent Marking，STW Mark Termination)
怀疑是不是申请内存失败后，没有触发oom退出。在golang标准库中查看oom相关的逻辑
mgcwork.go:374
if s == nil {
systemstack(func() {
s = mheap_.allocManual(workbufAlloc/pageSize, spanAllocWorkBuf)
})
if s == nil {
throw("out of memory")
}
// Record the new span in the busy list.
lock(&work.wbufSpans.lock)
work.wbufSpans.busy.insert(s)
unlock(&work.wbufSpans.lock)
}
mheap分配内存使用了mmap，继续怀疑是mmap返回的错误码在docker中不是非0
func sysMap(v unsafe.Pointer, n uintptr, sysStat *sysMemStat) {
sysStat.add(int64(n))
p, err := mmap(v, n, _PROT_READ| _PROT_WRITE, _MAP_ANON| _MAP_FIXED| _MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0)
if err == _ENOMEM {
throw("runtime: out of memory")
}
if p != v || err != 0 {
throw("runtime: cannot map pages in arena address space")
}
}
为了对比验证，用c写一段调用mmap的代码，在同一个docker中同时跑看下
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define BUF_SIZE 393216
void main() {
char *addr;
int i;
for(i=0;i<1000000;i++) {
addr = (char *)mmap(NULL, BUF_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
if (addr != MAP_FAILED) {
addr[0] = 'a';
addr[BUF_SIZE-1] = 'b';
printf("i:%d, sz: %d, addr[0]: %c, addr[-1]: %c\n", i, BUF_SIZE, addr[0], addr[BUF_SIZE-1]);
munmap(addr, BUF_SIZE);
} else {
printf("error no: %d\n", errno);
}
usleep(1000000);
}
}
mmap没有失败，而且同样会hang住，说明不是golang机制的问题，应该是阻塞在了系统调用上。查看调用堆栈，发现是hang在了cgroup中
[<ffffffff81224d65>] mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize+0x275/0x340
[<ffffffff811a068f>] pagefault_out_of_memory+0x2f/0x74
[<ffffffff81066bed>] __do_page_fault+0x4bd/0x4f0
[<ffffffff81801605>] async_page_fault+0x45/0x50
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
查看go程序，也有相同的调用堆栈
[<ffffffff81103681>] futex_wait_queue_me+0xc1/0x120
[<ffffffff81104086>] futex_wait+0xf6/0x250
[<ffffffff8110647b>] do_futex+0x2fb/0xb20
[<ffffffff81106d1a>] SyS_futex+0x7a/0x170
[<ffffffff81003948>] do_syscall_64+0x68/0x100
[<ffffffff81800081>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
[<ffffffff810f3ffe>] hrtimer_nanosleep+0xce/0x1e0
[<ffffffff810f419b>] SyS_nanosleep+0x8b/0xa0
[<ffffffff81003948>] do_syscall_64+0x68/0x100
[<ffffffff81800081>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
[<ffffffff81224c5a>] mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize+0x16a/0x340
[<ffffffff811a068f>] pagefault_out_of_memory+0x2f/0x74
[<ffffffff81066bed>] __do_page_fault+0x4bd/0x4f0
[<ffffffff81801605>] async_page_fault+0x45/0x50
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
[<ffffffff81224c5a>] mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize+0x16a/0x340
[<ffffffff811a068f>] pagefault_out_of_memory+0x2f/0x74
[<ffffffff81066bed>] __do_page_fault+0x4bd/0x4f0
[<ffffffff81801605>] async_page_fault+0x45/0x50
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
[<ffffffff81224c5a>] mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize+0x16a/0x340
[<ffffffff811a068f>] pagefault_out_of_memory+0x2f/0x74
[<ffffffff81066bed>] __do_page_fault+0x4bd/0x4f0
[<ffffffff81801605>] async_page_fault+0x45/0x50
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
看了下cgroup内存控制的代码，策略是没有可用内存并且未配置oom kill的程序，会锁在一个等待队列里，当有可用内存时再从队首唤醒。这个逻辑没办法通过配置或者其他方式绕过去。
elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.14…
/**
* mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize - complete memcg OOM handling
* @handle: actually kill/wait or just clean up the OOM state
*
* This has to be called at the end of a page fault if the memcg OOM
* handler was enabled.
*
* Memcg supports userspace OOM handling where failed allocations must
* sleep on a waitqueue until the userspace task resolves the
* situation. Sleeping directly in the charge context with all kinds
* of locks held is not a good idea, instead we remember an OOM state
* in the task and mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize() has to be called at
* the end of the page fault to complete the OOM handling.
*
* Returns %true if an ongoing memcg OOM situation was detected and
* completed, %false otherwise.
*/
bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool handle)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_in_oom;
struct oom_wait_info owait;
bool locked;
/* OOM is global, do not handle */
if (!memcg)
return false;
if (!handle)
goto cleanup;
owait.memcg = memcg;
owait.wait.flags = 0;
owait.wait.func = memcg_oom_wake_function;
owait.wait.private = current;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&owait.wait.entry);
prepare_to_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait, TASK_KILLABLE);
mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom(memcg);
locked = mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(memcg);
if (locked)
mem_cgroup_oom_notify(memcg);
if (locked && !memcg->oom_kill_disable) {
mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait);
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask,
current->memcg_oom_order);
} else {
schedule();
mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait);
}
if (locked) {
mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(memcg);
/*
* There is no guarantee that an OOM-lock contender
* sees the wakeups triggered by the OOM kill
* uncharges. Wake any sleepers explicitly.
*/
memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
}
cleanup:
current->memcg_in_oom = NULL;
css_put(&memcg->css);
return true;
}
结论：
docker内存耗光后，golang在gc的mark阶段，需要申请新的内存记录被标记的对象时，需要调用mmap，因为没有可用内存，就会被hang在cgroup中，gc无法完成也就无法释放内存，就会导致golang程序一直在stw阶段，无法对外服务，即使压力下降也无法恢复。最好还是不要关闭docker的oom-kill
以上就是golang进程在docker中OOM后hang住问题解析的详细内容，更多关于golang进程docker OOM hang的资料请关注软件开发网其它相关文章！
