Arrays.sort如何实现降序排序
目录
Arrays.sort实现降序排序
1.Collections的reverseOrder
2.利用Comparator接口复写compare
Arrays.sort底层原理
概述
案例
总结
Arrays.sort实现降序排序在调用Arrays.sort()对数组进行排序时，默认是升序排序的，如果想让数组降序排序，有下面两种方法：
1.Collections的reverseOrderimport java.util.*;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// 注意这里是Integer，不是int
Integer[] arr={9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1};
Arrays.sort(arr,Collections.reverseOrder());
for(int i:arr){
System.out.println(i);
}
}
}
2.利用Comparator接口复写compare
import java.util.*;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] arr={9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1};
Comparator cmp=new CMP();
Arrays.sort(arr,cmp);
for(int i:arr){
System.out.println(i);
}
}
}
class CMP implements Comparator<Integer>{
@Override //可以去掉。作用是检查下面的方法名是不是父类中所有的
public int compare(Integer a,Integer b){
// 两种都可以，升序排序的话反过来就行
// return a-b<0?1:-1;
return b-a;
}
}
注意：如果需要改变默认的排列方式，不能使用基本类型（int，char等）定义变量，而应该用对应的类
Arrays.sort底层原理 概述Collections.sort()方法底层调用的也是Arrays.sort()方法,下面我们通过测试用例debug,探究一下其源码,首先说一下结果,使用到了插入排序，双轴快排，归并排序
双轴快排(DualPivotQuicksort): 顾名思义有两个轴元素pivot1，pivot2，且pivot ≤
pivot2，将序列分成三段：x < pivot1、pivot1 ≤ x ≤ pivot2、x >pivot2，然后分别对三段进行递归。这个算法通常会比传统的快排效率更高，也因此被作为Arrays.java中给基本类型的数据排序的具体实现。
大致流程:
快速排序部分展开
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] nums = new int[]{6,5,4,3,2,1};
List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1);
Arrays.sort(nums);
Collections.sort(list);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(nums));
System.out.println(list);
}
运行结果
1 进入Arrays.sort()方法
/**
* Sorts the specified array into ascending numerical order.
*
* <p>Implementation note: The sorting algorithm is a Dual-Pivot Quicksort
* by Vladimir Yaroslavskiy, Jon Bentley, and Joshua Bloch. This algorithm
* offers O(n log(n)) performance on many data sets that cause other
* quicksorts to degrade to quadratic performance, and is typically
* faster than traditional (one-pivot) Quicksort implementations.
*
* @param a the array to be sorted
*/
public static void sort(int[] a) {
DualPivotQuicksort.sort(a, 0, a.length - 1, null, 0, 0);
}
方法上的注释
2 进入DualPivotQuicksort类内部的静态方法sort
方法上的注释
3 走sort的流程
1. 排序范围小于286的数组使用快速排序
// Use Quicksort on small arrays
if (right - left < QUICKSORT_THRESHOLD) {
sort(a, left, right, true);
return;
}
// Merge sort
......
2. 进入sort方法,判断数组长度是否小于47，小于则直接采用插入排序,否则执行3。
// Use insertion sort on tiny arrays
if (length < INSERTION_SORT_THRESHOLD) {
// Insertion sort
......
}
3. 用公式length/8+length/64+1近似计算出数组长度的1/7。
// Inexpensive approximation of length / 7
int seventh = (length >> 3) + (length >> 6) + 1;
4. 取5个根据经验得出的等距点。
/*
* Sort five evenly spaced elements around (and including) the
* center element in the range. These elements will be used for
* pivot selection as described below. The choice for spacing
* these elements was empirically determined to work well on
* a wide variety of inputs.
*/
int e3 = (left + right) >>> 1; // The midpoint
int e2 = e3 - seventh;
int e1 = e2 - seventh;
int e4 = e3 + seventh;
int e5 = e4 + seventh;
5.将这5个元素进行插入排序
// Sort these elements using insertion sort
if (a[e2] < a[e1]) { long t = a[e2]; a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
if (a[e3] < a[e2]) { long t = a[e3]; a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t;
if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
}
if (a[e4] < a[e3]) { long t = a[e4]; a[e4] = a[e3]; a[e3] = t;
if (t < a[e2]) { a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t;
if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
}
}
if (a[e5] < a[e4]) { long t = a[e5]; a[e5] = a[e4]; a[e4] = t;
if (t < a[e3]) { a[e4] = a[e3]; a[e3] = t;
if (t < a[e2]) { a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t;
if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
}
}
}
6. 选取a[e2]，a[e4]分别作为pivot1，pivot2。由于步骤5进行了排序，所以必有pivot1 <=pivot2。定义两个指针less和great，less从最左边开始向右遍历，一直找到第一个不小于pivot1的元素，great从右边开始向左遍历，一直找到第一个不大于pivot2的元素。
/*
* Use the second and fourth of the five sorted elements as pivots.
* These values are inexpensive approximations of the first and
* second terciles of the array. Note that pivot1 <= pivot2.
*/
int pivot1 = a[e2];
int pivot2 = a[e4];
/*
* The first and the last elements to be sorted are moved to the
* locations formerly occupied by the pivots. When partitioning
* is complete, the pivots are swapped back into their final
* positions, and excluded from subsequent sorting.
*/
a[e2] = a[left];
a[e4] = a[right];
/*
* Skip elements, which are less or greater than pivot values.
*/
while (a[++less] < pivot1);
while (a[--great] > pivot2);
7. 接着定义指针k从less-1开始向右遍历至great，把小于pivot1的元素移动到less左边，大于pivot2的元素移动到great右边。这里要注意，我们已知great处的元素小于pivot2，但是它于pivot1的大小关系，还需要进行判断，如果比pivot1还小，需要移动到到less左边，否则只需要交换到k处。
/*
* Partitioning:
*
* left part center part right part
* +--------------------------------------------------------------+
* | < pivot1 | pivot1 <= && <= pivot2 | ? | > pivot2 |
* +--------------------------------------------------------------+
* ^ ^ ^
* | | |
* less k great
*
* Invariants:
*
* all in (left, less) < pivot1
* pivot1 <= all in [less, k) <= pivot2
* all in (great, right) > pivot2
*
* Pointer k is the first index of ?-part.
*/
outer:
for (int k = less - 1; ++k <= great; ) {
short ak = a[k];
if (ak < pivot1) { // Move a[k] to left part
a[k] = a[less];
/*
* Here and below we use "a[i] = b; i++;" instead
* of "a[i++] = b;" due to performance issue.
*/
a[less] = ak;
++less;
} else if (ak > pivot2) { // Move a[k] to right part
while (a[great] > pivot2) {
if (great-- == k) {
break outer;
}
}
if (a[great] < pivot1) { // a[great] <= pivot2
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = a[great];
++less;
} else { // pivot1 <= a[great] <= pivot2
a[k] = a[great];
}
/*
* Here and below we use "a[i] = b; i--;" instead
* of "a[i--] = b;" due to performance issue.
*/
a[great] = ak;
--great;
}
}
8. 将枢轴交换到它们的最终位置
// Swap pivots into their final positions
a[left] = a[less - 1]; a[less - 1] = pivot1;
a[right] = a[great + 1]; a[great + 1] = pivot2;
9. 递归排序左右部分，不包括已知的枢轴
// Sort left and right parts recursively, excluding known pivots
sort(a, left, less - 2, leftmost);
sort(a, great + 2, right, false);
10. 对于中间的部分，如果大于4/7的数组长度，递归中间部分
/*
* If center part is too large (comprises > 4/7 of the array),
* swap internal pivot values to ends.
*/
if (less < e1 && e5 < great) {
/*
* Skip elements, which are equal to pivot values.
*/
while (a[less] == pivot1) {
++less;
}
while (a[great] == pivot2) {
--great;
}
/*
* Partitioning:
*
* left part center part right part
* +----------------------------------------------------------+
* | == pivot1 | pivot1 < && < pivot2 | ? | == pivot2 |
* +----------------------------------------------------------+
* ^ ^ ^
* | | |
* less k great
*
* Invariants:
*
* all in (*, less) == pivot1
* pivot1 < all in [less, k) < pivot2
* all in (great, *) == pivot2
*
* Pointer k is the first index of ?-part.
*/
outer:
for (int k = less - 1; ++k <= great; ) {
short ak = a[k];
if (ak == pivot1) { // Move a[k] to left part
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = ak;
++less;
} else if (ak == pivot2) { // Move a[k] to right part
while (a[great] == pivot2) {
if (great-- == k) {
break outer;
}
}
if (a[great] == pivot1) { // a[great] < pivot2
a[k] = a[less];
/*
* Even though a[great] equals to pivot1, the
* assignment a[less] = pivot1 may be incorrect,
* if a[great] and pivot1 are floating-point zeros
* of different signs. Therefore in float and
* double sorting methods we have to use more
* accurate assignment a[less] = a[great].
*/
a[less] = pivot1;
++less;
} else { // pivot1 < a[great] < pivot2
a[k] = a[great];
}
a[great] = ak;
--great;
}
}
}
// Sort center part recursively
sort(a, less, great, false);
4 小结
Arrays.sort对升序数组、降序数组和重复数组的排序效率有了很大的提升，这里面有几个重大的优化。
对于小数组来说，插入排序效率更高，每次递归到小于47的大小时，用插入排序代替快排，明显提升了性能。
双轴快排使用两个pivot，每轮把数组分成3段，在没有明显增加比较次数的情况下巧妙地减少了递归次数。
pivot的选择上增加了随机性，却没有带来随机数的开销。
对重复数据进行了优化处理，避免了不必要交换和递归。
总结以上为个人经验，希望能给大家一个参考，也希望大家多多支持软件开发网。
